Tuesday, July 28, 2009

"Rachel" in San Francisco: Who Needs a Guardian Council?

On Saturday, July 25, the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival screened Simone Bitton's new film, "Rachel," about the killing of pacifist ISM volunteer Rachel Corrie while she protested the demolition of a Palestinian family's home in Gaza. See below for links describing what happened during the screening. First, some background and commentary.

When the SF Jewish Film Festival decided to include Bitton's film in its program this year, it chose Bay Area-based Jewish Voice for Peace and the local chapter of the American Friends Service Committee to serve as the screening's sponsors. JVP has sponsored a number of films at the Festival in years past. (I organized one of these sponsorships for JVP in 2000, when noted journalists Amira Hass and Hamdi Farraj were invited as guests.) The Festival also invited Rachel's mother, Cindy Corrie, to speak in conversation with Festival director Peter Stein after the film's screening. These decisions unexpectedly provoked a furious reaction from some of the Festival's biggest funders, including the Koret Foundation, the Taube Foundation, and the Consulate General of Israel in San Francisco, as well as from organizations like the San Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC), which claims to represent the city's "organized" Jewish community (certain local groups, however, like Jewish Voice for Peace, are not welcome under the JCRC's tent).

These organizations' reactions against the film were so severe -- the Festival board's president, Shana Penn, who is also the executive director of the Taube Foundation, resigned, citing her disagreement over the Festival's handling of the film -- that the Festival agreed to invite local "pro-Israel" activist Dr. Michael Harris to give a "balancing" perspective in an introductory statement before the film's screening. Harris represents San Francisco Voice for Israel/Stand With US, an organization whose stated mission is to "take to the streets to respond to enemies of Israel in the San Francisco Bay Area." In other words, this is a purely reactionary organization without any positive agenda.

From the outset, it was clear that those objecting to Bitton's film regarded it as a nothing more than an attack on Israel, though these critics hadn't actually seen the film <http://bit.ly/UBQG2>. Moreover, the Koret and Taube foundations reverted to an ugly adversarial script in which, without a shred of credible evidence, they tarred Jewish Voice for Peace and AFSC as "virulently anti-Israel, anti-Semitic groups." Koret and Taube jointly issued a flamboyantly hysterical statement likening the Festival's screening of the film and inviting Cindy Corrie to sending Israel to its destruction <http://bit.ly/1W8dXs>.

What is most surprising about this episode is the degree to which Jewish community and charitable institutions in San Francisco -- historically one of the most progressive Jewish communities in the US -- see themselves as being on the defensive in the Obama era. These institutions have done a tremendous amount of needed charitable work in San Francisco, both within and outside the Jewish community. Yet they also historically have acted to set highly restrictive limits on the breadth of the Jewish community's political debate, and they display all the rigidity and corrosive defensiveness that the felt need for such discursive restrictions would imply.

But why were these organizations so provoked over the screening of a single critical film? Has President Obama's insistence that Israel halt all settlement construction so rattled Jewish leaders and institutions that a cultural event as apparently innocuous as this could set off all the alarm bells? This is hard to fathom, given that the President has repeatedly affirmed his intention to make Israel more secure, not less. The White House's stated objections, in recent days, not only to illegal settlement outposts but also to new Jewish construction in East Jerusalem that would harm prospects for a shared Jerusalem and an equitable resolution of the conflict seem expressly designed to curtail only the most egregious settlement activity -- activity which, in turn, is often paid for by American Jewish extremists like Irving Moskowitz and Ira Rennert <http://bit.ly/xjWUl>. What seems to be happening here is what progressive organizations like J-Street PAC have diagnosed as the disconnect between an established, often older, Jewish leadership and a younger generation of often unaffiliated Jews who hope for an equitable and principled resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict <http://bit.ly/nv4wN>.

It is worth remembering that the film which has generated so much acrimony and sniping was directed by Simone Bitton, a Jewish filmmaker born in Morocco and raised in Israel. (You can read an interview in which she discusses her motives for making the film, and her view of the question of guilt for Rachel Corrie's death, here: <http://bit.ly/cPzZV>.) The SF Jewish Film Festival is presenting 37 films made in or about Israel, as Joel Frangquist points out, including two about Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah and Hamas. Do Israel's self-declared supporters believe their cause is so fragile that a single film in this line-up, or a single critical speaker, could unfairly and irreversibly tilt the proverbial scales? More importantly, do they really believe that festival-goers need to be protected from ideas with which some do not agree? This is a profoundly un-Jewish attitude toward contention and dissent.

Here's a link to two personal accounts of what happended at Saturday's screening in San Francisco:

And here is a YouTube video of Michael Harris's much-heckled speech assailing the film:

--Lincoln Shlensky

Joel Beinin adds:

Neither [account of Saturday's screening, on the Muzzelwatch.com site] fully captures the super-charged atmosphere and the emotional impact of the film.

Among the highlights, Jonathan Pollack saying, "I couldn't live in this place if I didn't resist, not just words (mas sfatayim), but actual resistance."

Rela Mazali adds:

In autumn 2006 I was one of three speakers touring New England -- a Palestinian woman from Khan Yunis, a Palestinian woman from Bet Jallah and myself, an Israeli-born Jewish woman from Herzlia. Of the several dozen venues and organizers that hosted us over three weeks, only a tiny minority were Jewish. And yet, at least two of these were contacted by the Israeli consulate before our arrival and "strongly advised" to cancel our talks because we were allegedly anti-Israel and dubitable. At one of these venues, whose organizers nevertheless went ahead and held the planned events, someone in the audience commented, "Just imagine the scandal if it had been the consulate of some Arab country that was contacting Muslim or Arab organizations and 'recommending' what and whom they should or shouldn't host... yet the Israelis do it all the time and it's treated as standard fare."

Jewish Peace News editors:
Joel Beinin
Racheli Gai
Rela Mazali
Sarah Anne Minkin
Judith Norman
Lincoln Z. Shlensky
Rebecca Vilkomerson
Alistair Welchman
Jewish Peace News archive and blog: http://jewishpeacenews.blogspot.com
Jewish Peace News sends its news clippings only to subscribers. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or manage your subscription, go to http://www.jewishpeacenews.net


Hester said...

Hi Lincoln, Joel, and friends,

I'm not very "out there" in my activism, but I do want to thank you for this e-mail.

What I fail to understand is why disagreeing with what a government does is automatically, thoughtlessly and incorrectly assumed to indicate one is "anti-[fill in the blank]."

If you want a fair resolution to this conflict — "fair" meaning you are willing to listen to all perspectives, and don't instantly equate "Arab" with "terrorist" — you are considered anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic. If you didn't agree with any one thing (let alone anything) the Bush administration did, you were "anti-American." And on and on.

When will people get it that the opposite of love is not hate — it's apathy. If I were "anti-American" I wouldn't give a damn what my government is doing, because if the country gets better and makes the world a better place, fine, and if the country goes to hell in a handbag and takes the rest of the planet with it, equally fine.

About five years ago, for my anti-Iraq/Afghanistan war stance I was called a commie pinko America hater (and other equally erudite terms) by the online AOL-feedback community, instructed to go back to Russia, blah blah blah. It was my first and last time posting an opinion to a piece of reportage on the war. The writers couldn't stop and think long enough to realize that dissent and speaking out, in a situation that one considers unfair, unethical, and destructive to the stated goal, is actually *extremely* patriotic — indeed, it's one of the founding principles of this nation.

That Jews — what percentage of the ACLU and state branches of same? — are essentially saying "shut up" just leaves me at a loss for comprehension and words.

Thanks again, as the Move-On folks say, for all you do. God bless you for your courage. (And as Lev Liberman once said, "I don't believe in God, but I'm sure glad God believes in me!")


Hester Lox

Hester Lox
Professional Organizer
(415) 273-1330

~ Enabling you to
· use your time and energy the way you want to be using them
· transform "an interesting environment" into a clutter-free and welcoming space
· enhance your effectiveness ~ making tomorrow feel better than today
~ Compassionate and confidential
~ Serving all Bay Area counties
~ Also offering meticulous research, writing and editing
~ National Association of Professional Organizers (NAPO) ~ active member
of both the National Association and the SFBA chapter since 1992
· 24-hour voicemail, checked twice daily; calls promptly returned
· initial contact by phone preferred, but e-mail is fine too
· no fee for an in-depth, mutually exploratory phone consultation
· all regular clients get free phone help
· mutual cancellation policy

Anonymous said...

great story, thank you for the information and the good thoughts.

I saw a video of Michael Harris' appearance before the film showing.

I'm curious if there is a video of Cindy Corries post-film appearance.

Anonymous said...

guardian council is what?

and can you tell me what shana penn said?

and if she is related to sean?

and who is the new board pres?